relationship Fred-Anne

Guest · #1 (**permalink**) January 30th, 2006, 06:51 AM

I received the top-synergy report on my wife and myself and do not understand that 90% of the table is n/a.

moreover: as we are togther since 1984, this romance/passion/commitment scores seems quite low for such an enduring marriage. Question therefore is: howmuch research (relationships) are used to build this test. I am a professional astrologer myself specialized in relations (matchmaking) who recently have statistically tested my own match-methods using 3.4 million relationships (6.8 million birthdates, marriagedates and divorcedates, and my methods turned out to be significant. But my methods only in part use synastry-tables or composits. Can you be more specific on your methods?

Fred

topsynergy · #2 (**permalink**) January 30th, 2006, 06:58 AM

Dear Fred,

Thank you so much for your input.

I researched your relationship with*Anne.* Your beautiful relationship and my*computations do not conflict but rather are in harmony.

The conflict is between what we show on the report and the relationship itself.

We can cut it off right now, or you can help me to further develop this infant*report to a level of becoming a constructive tool for the benefit of the entire community.

Please let me know if you're up to it.

Guest · #3 (**permalink**) January 30th, 2006, 07:05 AM

Well, you did not answer my question on the number of examples you used to build your relationshiptest, which was my primary concern to identify the discrepancy between the testresult and my actual relationship.

I have read some articles on cosmodyes (Allen Edwall) and also tried these methods, but it somehow did not fullfill. Is your methodderived from these previous studies?

I am working myself on a commercial product now which uses the statistical significant results of my methods, so I will build this up first and do the tests on acceptance here before I will go 'internationally'

best wishes,

Fred

saturn_man · #4 (**permalink**) March 9th, 2006, 05:02 AM

[quote]Originally posted by archive
>> I have read some articles on cosmodyes (Allen Edwall) and also tried these methods, but it somehow did not fullfill. Is your methodderived from these previous studies?

May I help you with anything regarding cosmodynes?

Allen
www.astrowin.org

topsynergy · #5 (**permalink**) March 9th, 2006, 05:25 AM

Dear Fred,

I find it hard to deliver a responsible answer as to the size of the test database not because I'm lacking the numbers, but rather because of the quality issue involved.

The development and testing phases took about four years, during which we requested from thousands of volunteers to experiment and answer a survey. Now, when someone didn't answer - does it mean that he or she was in disagreement with the results? Also, only a small percentage could relate to the terminology of harmony, power, and later - commitment, intimacy, passion and synergy.

We keep gathering and processing input from our audience which is now in the one-million range.

And to your second question: Yes, my method is an extention or derivasion of the Church Of Light's Cosmodyne theory.

I wish you great success with your product. I'll be happy to contribute in which ever way possible.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

(View-All) Members who have read this thread : 0
There are no names to display.