|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Invite a friend
|
|||||||
| Register | Chat | Blogs | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | Radio and TV | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
Welcome to Top Synergy Connections
Here at tsConnections, we want you to know yourself and others better than ever before! We believe that the key to successful relationships is understanding who and what we are and coming to terms with our strengths and weaknesses. It means accepting ourselves wholeheartedly, knowing that imperfections and struggles are instrumental toward growth and self-development. We also want to know as much as we can about our friends, partners, and often family - not in a judgmental way, but as a means to accept and love them for what they are. And last but not least, we want to acquire the wisdom to find the choice few who are the best matches for whatever type of relationship we have in mind. True - the ever-expanding range of tools and know how required to achieve these important goals is provided to our members free of charge; in exchange we would like you to be an active participant in the life of our community, to help others or be helped yourself, and of course - voice any questions, feedback and suggestions you have. Don't hesitate sharing your thoughts with us, they are likely to enhance tsConnections’ future growth and development. We look forward to having you as a part of our growing family of open minded and spiritually inclined people who seek to get the most out of life through the hard work that personal responsibility and self awareness inspire. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
| Feedback & Suggestions We strive upon constructive criticism. Your comments - good or bad - are welcome. Tips and tricks regarding the Relationships with Celebrities and Famous site should be posted here. |
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 17th, 2006, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I'm missing the old report format
hello,
I've discovered your site a few weeks ago, and the relationship reports were more accurate with the red cross, and levels from 1 to 5. Will you add again the "levels"(commitment,intimacy...)from 1 to 5 in your reports? to my mind,a better overall view was given when the levels were indicated.As well, the highlighting of "potentially successful types of relationships" gave an easier insight into the (probable) possibilities of the analysed relationships. I wish I could find back one of these elements in the reports best regards & a Big thank you for this interesting site! 
|
|
October 18th, 2006, 12:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dear StarTiger33,
It is the second time already that we cut down on the amount of information given in the Relationships Analyst report in order to simplify the readout for the majority of our visitors. The complaints that we received quite often related at large to the complexity of data and its interpretation. Here are two options that will allow you to get the data that was given in the old format: 1. Hover with the mouse pointer on the images in the top table (even where it seems to be blank). You'll then be able to read the actual score. 2. Part of the URL (address) string to your report is "ra.asp?". change it to "raold.asp?" and you'll get your old report format back. Please let us know if this accommodation is good enough.
|
Cheers,|
October 18th, 2006, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
thank you very much
 glad to find the old format back with the tip you gave me 
__________________
st33
|
|
October 20th, 2006, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I received some new reports and I think your server is having a problem. If you hit the "click here" to get details about the "types of relationships and ingredients they require", they are all exactly the same no matter what relationship you are looking at. Is it supposed to be this way as a general guide, or is it supposed to be the breakdown of that particular relationship?
|
|
October 21st, 2006, 01:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
"Why do you show so many Xs in my relationships?", or "Why do I care about whether or not she can be my advisor?", etc. We decided to simplify the report design in a way that it gives a static read-out of the ingredients required in typical types of relationships. We assume that most visitors target their quest on a specific type of relationship with their match. We'll be happy to have your suggestions on how to improve the report.
|
|
October 22nd, 2006, 01:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here is an idea that covers both ends. Can you omit the old Xs and just highlight relationship lines where you find all the necessary ingredients?
P.S. Did anyone ever challenge your table of relationship-types and the qualities that they require? Did anyone suggested other types of relationships to be added to the menu?
|
|
October 22nd, 2006, 04:52 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
As to visitors commenting on the typical types of relationships that are showing in this table - we haven't got any comments of any sort about them. Feel free to debate existing types or to suggest new ones. We are in your debt for your wonderful idea [8D], and thank you starrboys for triggering this issue.
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
(View-All)
Members who have read this thread : 1
|
|
| redbaby |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| missing posts | junkbox505 | Q&A - You ask, we answer! | 1 | March 18th, 2007 03:33 AM |
| Like the new format | Slenkar | Feedback & Suggestions | 3 | January 4th, 2007 11:45 PM |
| The new report format | PrincessKLS1983 | Q&A - You ask, we answer! | 1 | December 6th, 2006 03:21 AM |
| Missing Wales: Resolved | Guest | Feedback & Suggestions | 1 | January 3rd, 2006 12:47 AM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 PM.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0