|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Chat | Blogs | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | Radio and TV | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Q&A - You ask, we answer! Best place to contact us with questions and alerts. First, please search the FAQ section; your question may have already been answered. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi - you don't have any years before 1930 available so how can we test out known good relationships that were either obviously passionate or endured the test of time? The two I wanted to test out include men who were born in 1925.
No way to input year before 1930? Bonnie |
|
||||
|
Dear Bonnie,
The world needs more people like you, who voice out opinions and needs. Per your request, we added the years 1920-1929. The reason we've omitted them originally was to ease data-entry. Thanks to your input, not only did we add these years but also found another way to keep everyone happy. Please check and tell us what you think. We hope to continue hearing from you as you progress with Top Synergy's powerful relationship analysis tools. |
|
|||
|
Thank you Shlomo!
I didn't see your other additions but guess what? My second relationship needs Wales! And my third needs a date of 12/25/1899! (Richard Burton and Humphrey Bogart) for their relationships to Elizabeth Taylor and Lauren Bacall respectively. The first must have passion and the second depth. If you can, that would be super. Put in one for Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward -- should have great friendship. Also I'm wondering why you don't include the birth data on your famous database? And why have more synergies up for those famous people? Or at least have their mates, having the database focus on famous relationships? Thanks again. Bonnie |
|
||||
|
Dear Bonnie,
I have the feeling that you'll become a great contributor in making Top Synergy an Icon for the global relationship community, and aren't we all on that path? Can you tell me a bit more about yourself? Now here're my comments: 1. Unfortunately, Wales is within the UK atlas nowadays. So just select UK (England) and enter the city name. 2. I don't mind to back date the years to 1890, but here comes another problem, which I tend to view as an opportunity: The email address that you use is unique to you. After your first inquiry - the system remembers and retrieves your original birth information. That answers a few of your questions about the report not reflecting the data which you entered. However, let's turn this challenge into an opportunity; there are relationships which you care to examine between famous people - whether they're already in our database or not. If they are not - please get me reliable resources that quote their accurate time of birth. Additionally, please specify what relationships between the famous you think that are of interest to you and to the community. We can post them on the site, the way you see Bill and Hillary Clinton on the home page or Bush and Cheney at http://www.topsynergy.com/famous/George_W_Bush.asp. Will you take this challenge? 3. I'm not sure that I understood your question about higher synergy with the famous. Can you elaborate? 4. Birth data for the famous IS included on the website. We just make the visitors click the link from the famous page to the Relationship Analyst page. There they see the accurate birth information. Otherwise, many people just enter the site in order to accumulate this information. Looking forward to a continuous correspondence. |
|
||||
|
Dear Bonnie,
Better late than never Wales is now on our database of countries. |
|
|||
|
Hi Shlomo,
I've been studying and practicing astrology since 1973. I focus on natal and synastric interpretation (everybody wants to know about the next heart-throb, after all--it can't be avoided as one of the most popular questions for an astrologer) and I do a year-ahead look using transits, arcs, and progressions. Mostly, I'm interested in the archetypes people are working with this lifetime for fulfillment and I'm always fascinated by synastry. So, naturally, I'm interested in testing out topsynergy to see how it holds up, what it analyses, etc. I was surprised by the Clintons' mild connections -- one would think they'd be in the 4-5s with respect to committment with what they've been through together. So I'm supposing that what's being measured is their individual capacity for these various attributes and then how that relates to the other. I have read the articles, and I will read them again. I've gone on the site and picked Teresa Heinz Kerry and John Kerry -- putting John Kerry in the "me" slot -- so hopefully the computer will kick it back with the name John Kerry so I don't get confused! Then, I'll have to go from there with more. I'll see what I can do with what's there, and send you data re the ones I want to check out -- I didn't quite understand the posting to the site process -- is that something you'd have to do? I definitely want to see Humphrey Bogart-Lauren Bacall, and Richard Burton-Elizabeth Taylor (passion), and I'll think of more. Spencer Tracy-Katherine Hepburn (though I get the feeling that Spencer led two lives and Katherine just didn't realize that when he went on six-week binges, he was just with his wife and kids, so their relationship was a little bit one-sided perhaps, in a certain way -- that one would be interesting). Thanks for the support! Bonnie |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
|
| There are no names to display. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|