|
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Chat | Blogs | FAQ | Donate | Members List | Calendar | Radio and TV | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Q&A - You ask, we answer! Best place to contact us with questions and alerts. First, please search the FAQ section; your question may have already been answered. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hi, I was wondering how rare it is to have all green with someone. I submitted a report between myself and Mackenzie Astin, who's a good actor but kind of a minor celebrity. I've been paying attention to him off and on for many years because he and I are exactly 10 days apart in age. The results appear to be quite remarkable. It gave me not only all green, but a 130 Love RQ, 110 Friendship, 140 Sex, and 110 Partners, for a combined synergy of 2. I was wondering how rare this was, and if it's only because the birthdates are so close together. BTW, I used exact birth times for both.
|
|
||||
|
Welcome aboard, cdmc, and thank you for an interesting question.
1. It is easy to check how rare or common your findings are by the statistics that we've compiled in the post What is RQ (Relationship Quotient)?. Sorry for the poor design 2. There's absolutely no correlation between the proximity of your time of birth to the powerful relationship you may have. As a proof, just analyze a relationship between you and yourself. Shocked by the findings? |
|
||||
|
Reviewing your RQ ratings, that relationship looks more than dominant, it looks powerful, and it seems like a two is a low summation? I'm curious- what would have to have been different for this person to have gotten a three for synergy, instead of a two?
|
|
||||
|
A synergy of "1" is also a powerful and somewhat rare quality to be found, not to speak of "2".
It will take me some research to go back to the database and find the underlying levels of harmony and power that the result of their multiplication awards a synergy of "3", and since we do not show yet these values, let's wait first for the new report format to materialize, shall we? |
|
||||
|
AHA! So in fact, two is unusual and a high score! I'm intrigued. Now, I must know the answer to this. Am I right in believing that the synergy score is not dependent on the "love, friendship, and sexual attraction" scores? It's very significant that you (top synergy) can't think of a relationship generating a three or a four or, even, dare I say it, a five? Synergy is the only reading which does not show an individual score for each party. So it is the most mysterious number of all! I have seen the basic definition...but it's the application thereof that's the real corker.. Mentor, do help me understand! Am I on the right track? Or have I found a rabbit trail???? Claygal
|
|
||||
|
The presence and strength of synergic energies are totally independent of those of commitment, intimacy and passion. In other words, there may be a very strong friendship or love relationship without synergy, and vice versa.
I guess that it's clear that synergy is based on the aggregated energies of two or more people. Thus, there is no unilateral synergy. You must have a partner in order to obtain greater achievements than what you can do on your own. Have I answered your questions? I really like your fascination with synergy. This is how scientists had felt when they understood the synergic powers in chemistry, physics, and even philosophy. |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
|
| Aphrodite, laura4722, Neth, redbaby, The_Tigress |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eva Green | betti | Added | 1 | May 14th, 2008 07:34 AM |
| Robson Green | ClayGal | Added | 1 | April 26th, 2008 01:49 PM |